What exactly is ‘other comprehensive income’?

Published on 11 September 2009 3 comments

Many companies with December year ends have by now completed their half-year reporting cycle and are more familiar with the new presentation requirements introduced in IAS 1 (Revised). In many cases, the changes have been cosmetic – an extra line item here and an additional disclosure there – but we have to remember that this is only a step in the IASB’s financial statement presentation journey.

 

One of the new concepts introduced this year is the notion of other comprehensive income (OCI). This might appear in a separate statement (looking rather similar to its predecessor – the statement of recognised income and expense) or towards the bottom of a single performance statement – a statement of comprehensive income.

 

What is OCI? This is an extremely difficult question to answer. The following are examples of items that IFRS either permits or requires to be presented as OCI:

 

• Foreign currency translation adjustments on foreign subsidiaries
• Changes in the fair value of available-for-sale financial assets
• Actuarial gains and losses arising on a defined benefit pension plan
• Revaluations of property, plant and equipment
• Changes in the fair value of a financial instrument in a cash flow hedge

 

There is no obvious principle that drives these gains and losses out of earnings and into OCI. They all reflect re-measurements as a result of movements in a price or valuation, but so do some items that are unquestionably included within earnings (such as fair value gains and losses on traded derivatives and investment properties). There is also the question of recycling.

 

Some of these items (such as foreign currency translation adjustments and changes in the fair value of available-for-sale financial assets) are recognised in OCI but are then recognised again in earnings when the underlying item (that is, the foreign subsidiary or available-for-sale financial asset) is sold or realised. In other cases (such as actuarial gains and losses and revaluations of property, plant and equipment) there is no recycling.

 

Items that historically have been recorded outside of earnings have largely been addressed piecemeal in order to resolve specific issues. A recent example has been the proposed treatment of equity investments in July’s exposure draft on financial instruments classification and measurement. However, in that particular case the IASB highlighted the complexity of the issue when it commented that “it would be difficult, and perhaps impossible, to develop a clear and robust principle that would identify investments that are different enough in nature to justify a different presentation requirement”.

 

This might explain why the IASB has not, in its financial statement presentation project or separately, addressed the following fundamental questions: What is the purpose of OCI and its separation from earnings? Which gains and losses on re-measurement to fair value should be reported in earnings and which in OCI? Which items, if any, should be recycled?

 

Is pragmatism the right approach, or should the IASB initiate a separate project to address these issues as a matter of priority?


«Full steam ahead for financial instruments specialists | Homepage | Digging around for an accounting solution »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451623c69e20120a5b9c238970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What exactly is ‘other comprehensive income’?:

Comments (3)

Alfredo Mariano commented:

This is not a comment but a query, what if the 5 examples are not generated nor the company has no transactions related to the 5 stated items to permeate OCI presentation?

Juliechristie commented:

I’d be interested to see blogs in English that isn’t US-based (or Canadian) and still just as successful as those above and they can’t be about blogging or monetization.


rapid income creator

Yash commented:

The unrealised gain on account of 'mark -to -market' of assets available for sale gets reported in OCI . I strongly feel that this is the correct method of reporting such unrealised gain as the same should not be available for distribution by way of dividend.
The year in which the assets available for sale are sold the unrealised Gain linked to that asset which appeared in OCI in the earlier periods should be transferred to 'Net Income'.
The unrealsied loss on assets available for sale should appear in 'Net Income' .

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post your comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.