The performance statement
Do investors and companies see eye to eye?
Reporting performance and the importance of earnings measures are subjects close to the heart of many in the corporate reporting world. Debate on these issues is heating up with the format of the performance statement under review by the IASB and the FASB. I have mentioned in previous postings that PricewaterhouseCoopers has been conducting a survey on performance reporting and the results of that work – entitled Performance statement: Coming together to shape the future – have now hit the virtual news stands.
We asked both investment professionals and preparers of financial statements from the corporate community about the key elements of information that need to be visible in the income statement. One of our most striking findings is the degree of congruence between the views of both types of respondents.
- Both investment professionals and preparers stress the need to be able to distinguish “underlying” earnings from both one-off events (such as a gain from the sale of a business) and the impact of the re-measurement of assets or liabilities.
- Respondents believe that the earnings number is useful and largely agree upon how that number should be defined.
- Non-GAAP information is held to be valuable by the vast majority of respondents, though it was widely held that some ground rules should govern their use.
- The only key areas of divergence between investment professional and corporate lie in the granularity of tax reporting and how segments should be determined.
The IASB and FASB are working together towards a discussion paper on the subject of financial statement presentation. With such a high level of agreement between the preparers and users of corporate information, a practical solution to the performance reporting conundrum must be within reach.
I would be interested to hear any comments that you may have on our findings either by email or by commenting here.




Recent Comments