The IFRS journey – where did we come from?
For those of us who have been working with IFRS on a day to day basis, particularly in Europe, 2005 seems a long way back in the past.
But a recent wide-ranging study of IFRS implementation by European companies in 2005 provides some useful reminders of why we got here. The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) has just published its report, conducted for the European Commission. It looks at the consolidated financial statements of 200 EU publicly traded companies, and surveyed over 350 investors, preparers and auditors across 25 member states.
Key findings included:
• There is widespread agreement that IFRS has made financial statements easier to compare across countries, and across industry sectors.
• The majority of investors, preparers and auditors (63%, 60% and 80% respectively) consider that IFRS has improved the quality of financial statements.
• There is evidence that IFRS is influencing the investment decisions of investors and internal management reporting within companies.
• The reviews of individual companies’ financial statements demonstrated a high level of compliance with IFRS.
Overall, the message is that IFRS generally has been seen as a positive development for EU financial reporting.
That is not to say that problem areas were not identified and, of course, some teething problems would be expected in the first year of application. A few individual standards came up for criticism, including IAS 39, and there were worries about the increasing complexity of standards and the pace of development of new requirements.
The IASB has reacted to some of these concerns – for example by giving a moratorium on new standards until 2009 and providing longer lead-times before standards become effective.
We know from the current difficulties with the endorsement of new standards in Europe that some aspects of IFRS, and indeed the standard setting process itself, are being questioned by some. But taken together, the results of this survey provide a timely reminder of why we embarked on the IFRS journey: to bring increased comparability and consistency to reporting in support of a single capital market. The road back to different national GAAPs with all that entails is not an enticing one from where I’m sitting.
Do you think a single set of accounting standards for the world is a journey that we should continue? Do we have a realistic chance of completing that journey and meeting the objectives that we set ourselves at the outset in Europe?




Recent Comments