Inflation hits richest and poorest hardest

Published on 20 November 2012 0 comments

By Tom Robinson, PwC Economist, and John Hawksworth, Chief Economist


Media attention focuses on the headline inflation rate, which rose by a surprisingly large amount from 2.2% in September to 2.7% in October. But it is also interesting to ask how this inflation rate varies across households in different income groups – are prices rising faster for the poor or the rich?

Our analysis of this issue, as featured in the press recently, shows that the highest inflation rates over the year to October were faced by the richest and poorest income groups. For the richest 10% of households, this was driven by the rise in university tuition fees in October. But excluding this exceptional rise in educational costs, the poorest households faced the highest underlying inflation rate due to increased food prices and domestic water bills.

We used data on household spending patterns by income group from the 2011 Family Spending survey to assess how inflation rates differ between income deciles (i.e. ranging from the poorest 10% to the richest 10% of households). Figure 1 summarises these results for the overall Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation rate in the year to October 2012.

Inflation-rate-by-income-decile

Our analysis suggests that the highest inflation rate of nearly 3% was experienced by the richest 10% of households due to their particularly high exposure to the exceptional rise in tuition fees this October. Education accounts for over 4% of total household spending by this group compared to only around 1% of spending on average for the poorest 20% of households.

However, the second highest inflation rate of 2.8% was experienced by the poorest 10% of households, who are most exposed to recent rises in the price of food and higher domestic water bills since April.

Given the exceptional nature of the rise in tuition fees, which pushed up total education costs by a record 19.1% between September and October, it is reasonable also to consider underlying inflation rates excluding education costs, as shown in Figure 2.

Inflation-rate-by-income-decile-excluding-educationOnce education is stripped out, the underlying inflation rate falls back markedly to around 2.3%, and a clearer pattern emerges with the lowest income groups facing the highest inflation rates due to larger price increases for essential items such as food and water. The poorest 10% of households face an underlying inflation rate of around 2.5%, as against just 2.1% for the richest 10% of households, who spend a much lower proportion of their income on these essential items.

This continues the pattern of most recent years in which rises in global commodity prices for essential products have had a proportionately greater impact on the poorest households, intensifying the squeeze on their real incomes from the economic downturn. At the moment, these differentials in inflation by income group are not particularly large (e.g. compared the situation to early 2008). But they could widen again if global growth accelerates again in 2013-14, which will tend to push up prices of food, energy, metals and other basic products.


Contact:

John Hawksworth  |  Tel: +44 (0)20 7213 1650

Tom Robinson |  Tel: +44 (0)20 7213 4302


«Electricity Market Reform | Homepage | New OBR forecasts – a lucky escape for the Chancellor? »

Comments (0)

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post your comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.